Monday 18 July 2016

REVIEW: Independence Day: Resurgence

We will not go quietly into the night...

In the current climate of reincarnating and rebooting beloved movies, 1996’s seminal disaster movie Independence Day gets a sequel 20 years later – and probably at least 15 years too late. Original director, Roland Emmerich (Hollywood’s go-to guy for disaster movies) wants a piece of the reboot pie – and brings back (most of) the original cast and some new characters to the fore. However, it seems that to make a sequel, Emmerich thinks that by hiding a very weak (and convenient) story behind mindboggling special effects, a blockbuster it will make.  To a certain extent and to a certain type of audience this may well be true, but for the rest of us, we have a weaker sequel desperately out of time, hanging onto the coattails of a ground breaking original.
I loved the first movie and using talent like Will Smith, Jeff “The Goldblum” Goldblum and Bill Pullman was brilliant as they are all fantastic actors. Sadly, Will Smith doesn’t reprise his role as we are suggested to that his character has been killed in a test flight and is no longer part of the team. However, those who are disappointed in this can be rest assured that they have cast a suitable replacement as his son – who is basically a cardboard cut-out likeness of a younger Smith but without the sass and Smith-ness that we come to expect from him. However, we could have had Jayden Smith as the heir to the character, but based on his previous performances in other movies I think we dodged that worry.
New cast members are younger, as if taking the reins from Goldblum and co. and such whippersnappers include Liam Hemsworth. He heads up the next generation, fresh from the Hunger Games and does a good job. The remaining young ‘uns are all there to tick off boxes really – token black guy (the Will Smith dude), hot Chinese girl for the geeky sidekick and the girl who becomes the love interest for Liam’s character. Goldblum and Pullman reprise their roles and great comic relief from Star Trek: The Next Generation’s Brent Spiner add some gravitas and links to the previous film, but although it goes some way to smooth the ride, it’s still not enough to let it stand aside its predecessor.
The story goes that 20 years on, Earth has learned to put aside its differences after winning the war against the aliens – and we have been using their technology to bolster earth should they return (which Goldblum is convinced they will). As we need something to happen in the story, of course, they come back! However, the technology is better and we are again in a hopeless situation – and what follows is what you would expect – and that is where the film isn’t as good as it could have been.
The biggest problem is that the movie is a basic paint by numbers of a disaster movie/sci fi invasion movie with overwhelmingly convenient moments to help the main characters out.  And, like previous Emmerich movie 2012, the characters face certain doom on multiple occasions but the 1% chance of survival ALWAYS comes through. As a result you are left with an ‘on the edge of your seat’ style movie without the tension because you know the characters will always survive. It also has an undercurrent of patriotism and a little bit too much of “yay, America” -this sentiment might have worked in the 90’s but the world has moved on from such isolated views (maybe).
Overall though, even though it has its faults, it’s an enjoyable sci-fi/action adventure – a bit predictable but very exciting even so. Worth a watch, I reckon.

POPSCORE: 7/10

What am I talking about? Independence Day: Resurgence movie
Where can I find out more? http://www.foxmovies.com/movies/independence-day-resurgence
If you liked this try: Independence Day, The Day After Tomorrow, 2012 (oh hang on they are all Roland Emmerich movies ain't they?), Mars Attacks, San Andreas

Anything else?
Will Smith isn't in this one, though you might see his picture on the wall of the White House.


1 comment:

  1. A worthy review of a sadly unworthy movie.

    Grabbing his slice if the reboot culture, Roland Emmerich has pretty much shown us that in the years ID4 (the original, shortened to look cool-ish), he has learned very little in the way of creating a thinking person's science fiction film. In the first we were all blown away by the size of the spaceships, the invulnerability of the alien race & a myriad of pretty decent special effects. For example, in the first movie, just one part of the size of the ships was gauged by one reporter as being "a parabolic indentation, 5 cities wide", and this was just the big indented part where the vertical fin was attached, I mean these things were huge, massive. We hadn't seen anything on this scale since Superman flew up into outer space and reversed the earth's rotation.

    Now we have Independence Day Resurgence. A premise by where earh has gained from its original encounter in the form of knowledge & new alien technology. The ex-president is slowly going nuts (one of the aliens from the original spoke through him, must have fried his grey matter to some degree", there are wide angle shots of new buildings & technology which very rarely ever seemto go into any greater detail, and a new ship that dwarfs the mothership of the original. Classic ingredients for a mix of movie making that we have seen many times previously.

    As the film unfolds and we are introduced to the characters, we see a lot of the original movie in this. Earth in mortal danger, huge ships, stereotypical characters who are easily categorised into the order by which they will either snuff it or save the world, just by looking at their nasal hair. The central element kind of held us for some time, this being the queen alien (incidentally protected by dozens of other aliens centred around her hive, ring any bells?) and when we do see her it's actually pretty refreshing, she looks quite a character, albeit with some anger management issues, and suffering from psychotic episodes possibly triggered by remnants of Britney Spears tunes overheard in the original invasion, but she is one big bad ass momma, and it kind of makes you wonder why she wasn't introduced earlier, shecould have caused sheer carnage, but then again, would you send your mother out to invade Cambodia by herself? Nah.

    ReplyDelete